Efficacy Of Intercostal Nerve Block Research Articles

Re: Gyawali, Sushil; Luitel, Bhoj Raj; Bhattarai, Amit Sharma; Sharma, Uttam Kumar. Comparison of efficacy of intercostal nerve block versus peritract infiltration with 0.25% bupivacaine in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Indian Journal of Urology 40(1):p 37-43, Jan-Mar 2024.

Re: Gyawali, Sushil; Luitel, Bhoj Raj; Bhattarai, Amit Sharma; Sharma, Uttam Kumar. Comparison of efficacy of intercostal nerve block versus peritract infiltration with 0.25% bupivacaine in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Indian Journal of Urology 40(1):p 37-43, Jan-Mar 2024.

Comparison of efficacy of intercostal nerve block versus peritract infiltration with 0.25% bupivacaine in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective randomized clinical trial.

Postoperative pain following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) adds to the morbidity of patients requiring additional analgesia. Various modalities of pain control techniques, such as intercostal nerve block (ICNB) and peritract infiltration (PTI), are being studied for better pain management. This study compares the efficacy of ICNB with PTI for postoperative pain management. A double-blinded, prospective, randomized control study was conducted, in which 0.25% bupivacaine, either ICNB or PTI, was given at the puncture site at the end of PCNL. The primary outcome was a comparison of postoperative pain score measured with resting Visual analogue Scale (r-VAS) and dynamic VAS (D-VAS) recorded at 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h, 24 h, and at discharge. Injection ketorolac was given as rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes include time to first rescue analgesia and total analgesic requirement (TAR). Sixty patients were randomized into two equal groups with 63.3% male and 36.6% female, with a mean age of 37.25 ± 13.09 years. In Group ICNB, 24 (40%) and 6 (10%) patients and in Group PTI, 21 (35%) and 9 (15%) patients underwent standard and mini PCNL, respectively, in each group. All cases were PCNL doen in prone position. The mean R-VAS and D-VAS scores at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h were similar in both groups. The mean TAR was 56.84 ± 0.33.00 mg and 55.54 ± 0.29.64 mg of injection ketorolac in Group ICNB and PTI, respectively (P < 0.894). The time to first rescue analgesic demand were 7.11 ± 4.898 h and 6.25 ± 3.354 h (P < 0.527). Both the groups were comparable in terms of length of hospital stay, stone clearance rate, and complication rate. The ICNB was as efficacious as PTI for postoperative pain control with 0.25% bupivacaine following PCNL.

The Efficacy of Intercostal Nerve Block in the Management of Postoperative Pain After Costal Cartilage Harvest for Craniofacial Reconstruction Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Autologous costal cartilage harvest is a common procedure in craniofacial reconstruction due to its stability, dependability, and diversity. However, such a procedure is associated with severe donor-site pain postoperatively. Therefore, we aim through this study to compare the efficacy of intercostal nerve block in the management of postoperative pain in patients undergoing costal cartilage harvest for craniofacial reconstruction. This systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The study systematically reviewed MEDLINE, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases without time-limitation. As a result of reviewing the literature, 33 articles were screened by full-text resulting in 14 articles which met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. However, only four high-quality RCT articles were included in the quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis). The findings of this study suggest that there is no significant difference in pain scores between ICNB and control groups at 12, 24, and 48h postoperatively, both at rest and with coughing. Therefore, both techniques are considered safe and effective. Our results show evidence of favorable outcome of preventive donor-site analgesia with ICNB for harvesting autologous costal cartilage in multiple studies. However, the overall outcomes were insignificant between the two arms. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Analgesic efficacy of intercostal nerve block in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

Pain is important morbidity following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). Various adjunctive procedures such as intercostals nerve block (ICNB) have been described to reduce post-operative pain. The aim of this review was to determine the analgesic efficacy of ICNB in PNL patients. Systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant publications. We followed preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines while conducting this review. In this review, five randomized studies with 319 patients were included. The analgesic requirement was statistically similar in ICNB and control group (Standard mean difference (SMD) -0.48 confidence interval (CI)[-1.4, 0.44] p=0.31) whereas analgesic requirement was lower for peritubal infiltration group (PTI) as compared to ICNB (SMD 0.85 CI[0.25,1.44] p=0.005). Also, time to first analgesic requirement was similar between ICNB and PTI (SMD 0.86 CI[-9.3,11.0]), p=0.87). Pain according to VAS (visual analog scale) and Dynamic VAS (DVAS) at 24 hours was lower in ICNB group as compared to the control group; however, only DVAS at 24 hours was statistically significant. DVAS and VAS at 24 hours were similar for both ICNB and PTI. Intercostal nerve block in terms of analgesic requirement appears to be inferior to peritubal block and no better than control group. Also, mean pain scores for ICNB were similar to control group and peritubal block.

Intercostal Nerve Block and Peritubal Infiltration with Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomised Clinical Study

Introduction: Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL), a common endourologic procedure for removal of renal stones is associated with significant pain. Regional blocks are being used for postoperative analgesia after PCNL. Aim: To compare the analgesic efficacy of intercostal nerve block and fluoroscopic guided peritubal infiltration in terms of duration of analgesia, postoperative pain scores and total analgesic consumption in first 24 hours. Materials and Methods: This was a randomised clinical trial conducted from May 2018 to October 2018 on total of eighty patients, randomly allocated to two groups of 40 each. Group IC received intercostal nerve block and group IF received fluoroscopy guided peritubal infiltration with 0.25% bupivacaine. Duration of analgesia was assessed from postoperative pain scores (Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) during rest and coughing). Total analgesic consumption for 24 hours was also noted. Data was analysed using Chi-square test for categorical variables and independent Student’s t-test for quantitative variables. Results: The duration of analgesia was 702.00±140.022 minutes in Group IC and 346.50±129.566 minutes in group IF which was significant statistically with a p-value of &lt;0.001. Resting and dynamic NRS were lower upto 12 hours postoperatively in group IC (p-value less than 0.05). Both tramadol (50.00±11.32 mg vs 82.50±24.15 mg) and paracetamol (100±303.82mg vs 850±622.23mg) requirements were lower in group IC as compared to group IF with p-values less than 0.001. Total consumption of first rescue analgesic tramadol as well as second analgesic Paracetamol both were significantly lesser(p-value&lt;0.001) in group IC than group IF. Conclusion: Intercostal Nerve Block (INB) provided superior analgesia compared to fluoroscopic guided peritubal infiltration after PCNL.

Atrial septal defect closure via mini-thoracotomy in pediatric patients: Postoperative analgesic effect of intercostal nerve block.

In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of intercostal nerve block for postoperative pain management in pediatric patients undergoing atrial septal defect closure through a right lateral mini-thoracotomy. Between January 2016 and January 2019, a total of 63 pediatric patients (37 males, 26 females; mean age 34.8±26.8 months; range, 2 to 96 months) who underwent corrective congenital heart surgery for atrial septal defect closure through a right lateral mini-thoracotomy were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups as those (Group 1, n=33) receiving intercostal nerve block and general anesthesia and those (Group 2, n=30) receiving general anesthesia alone. Intravenous morphine at a dose of 0.03 mg/kg was applied as rescue analgesia to the patients with a Ramsay Sedation Scale score of >4 and Children"s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale score of >7. The total analgesic requirement, adverse effects, duration of mechanical ventilation and length of stay in the intensive care unit were recorded. The mean duration of mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit stay was shorter in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (3.6±1.3 vs. 9.4±2.1 h; 23±2.6 vs. 30±7.2 h, respectively) (p<0.0001). The need for postoperative rescue analgesia was statistically significantly lower in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (0.3±0.5 mg vs. 1.1±0.9 mg, respectively) (p=0.003). The mean total morphine consumption was also lower in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (4.0±2.2 mg vs. 9.0±3.4 mg, respectively) (p<0.0001). Intercostal nerve block before thoracotomy closure in pediatric patients undergoing atrial septal defect repair under mini-thoracotomy provides early extubation, shorter mechanical ventilation duration and intensive care unit stay, and reduced analgesic requirements.

Evaluation of the efficacy of erector spinae plane block and intercostal nerve block in the postherpetic neuralgia.

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of an intercostal nerve block, which has been used for many years in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia, and the more recent alternative of an erector spinae plane (ESP) block. The records of 39 patients who were treated in the algology department for postherpetic neuralgia between May 1, 2015 and May 1, 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients who received an intercostal nerve block constituted Group 1 and those who received an ESP block were categorized as Group 2. The change in numeric rating scale (NRS) and Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) scores in the short term and in the long term were the primary results of the study. The NRS, LANSS, and sleep interference scale (SIS) scores of the patients in Group 1 and Group 2 were found to be significantly lower at the 24th hour, week 4, and week 12 compared with the values obtained before block application. In Group 1, the scores recorded at week 4 and week 12 were significantly higher than the 24th hour values, whereas no difference was observed between these results in Group 2. There was no significant difference between the groups in the week 4 and week 12 scores. Similarly, no significant difference was observed in the NRS, LANSS, or SIS scores before the block application or at the 24th hour. However, the scores at week 4 and week 12 were significantly lower in Group 2 compared with Group 1. The results indicated that an ESP block significantly decreased neuropathic pain symptoms and the need for additional treatment in postherpetic neuralgia treatment in the long term.

A randomised evaluation of intercostal block as an adjunct to epidural analgesia for post-thoracotomy pain.

Background and Aims:Post-thoracotomy pain can be severe and disabling. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of intercostal nerve block when used as adjunct to thoracic epidural analgesia in patients undergoing posterolateral thoracotomy.Methods:This was a parallel-group randomised patient and assessor-blinded study carried out at a tertiary-referral cancer center. We included 60 adult patients undergoing elective lung resection under general anaesthesia with thoracic epidural analgesia. In addition, the intervention arm received single-shot intercostal blocks with 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine at the level of and two levels above and below the thoracotomy. We assessed post-operative pain scores at 2 to 4 hours and 18 to 24 hours after surgery, peri-operative fentanyl requirement, percentage of patients who needed fentanyl PCA and maximum volume achieved on bedside spirometry 18 to 24 hours after surgery. Groups were compared using the unpaired t-test for continuous data and the chi square test for categorical data at a 5% level of significance.Results:2 to 4 hours post-operatively, mean pain scores at rest were 3.0 in both groups (difference 0.04, 95% CI -1.1 to + 1.1) and on coughing were 4.6 (ICB group) and 4.9 (C group) (difference 0.32, 95% CI -1.0 to + 1.6). There were no differences between the groups for any of the other outcomes.Conclusion:Addition of intercostal block to epidural analgesia does not confer any benefit in terms of post-operative pain, fentanyl requirements or volume achieved on spirometry.

Efficacy of intercostal nerve block with 0.25% bupivacaine in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective randomized clinical trial.

Introduction and Aim:Several techniques have been used to lower the morbidity of percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) tube after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The outcomes of intercostal nerve block (ICB) versus peritubal block (PTB) with 0.25% bupivacaine to alleviate post-PCNL pain were compared.Materials and Methods:After obtaining an informed written consent and local institutional ethics clearance, 64 patients undergoing PCNL were computer randomized to receive either an intercostal block/ICB (Group I) or a peritubal block/PTB (Group II) using 0.25% bupivacaine infiltration, after termination of the procedure. They were evaluated for visual analog scale (VAS) score, first analgesic requirement, and the total analgesic demand along with fall in hematocrit, PCN indwelling time, blood transfusion rate, complications, and mean hospital stay in the postoperative period. The protocol was registered with CTRI/2018/03/012717.Results:Patients in both the groups were comparable on the basis of demographic data, preoperative renal function, stone burden, and hematocrit value. The mean VAS score at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h was significantly lower in the Group II versus Group I (P < 0.001). The total mean analgesic requirement was 160.16 and 103.13 mg of diclofenac sodium in Group I and Group II, respectively, which was significantly higher in Group I versus Group II (P < 0.001). The time to first analgesic demand was significantly higher in PT group (8.06 ± 1.99 h vs. 12.97 ± 1.96 h) in Group I/ICNB and Group II/PT, respectively (P < 0.001). Both the groups were comparable in terms of postoperative hematuria, hematocrit fall, nephrostomy site leak, hospital stay, need of blood transfusions, stone-free rate/retreatment rate, postoperative urinary tract infections, and overall complication rate (Modified Clavien–Dindo classification) which were not statistically significant.Conclusion:Post PCNL, PTB was associated with significantly lower post operative pain and discomfort versus ICB as demonstrated by the significantly lower DVAS pain scores, higher mean time to first analgesic demand and lower mean total analgesic demandt with ICB. Bupivacaine was a safe and effective local anesthetic agent for PTB in select patients for facilitating quick relief from the morbid postoperative pain and discomfort following PCNL.

Effect of Intercostal Nerve Block and Nephrostomy Tract Infiltration With Ropivacaine on Postoperative Pain Control After Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Prospective, Randomized, and Case-controlled Trial

To determine the efficacy of intercostal nerve block and nephrostomy tract infiltration (NTI) with ropivacaine in patients undergoing tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (TPCNL). From February 2015 to March 2017, a total of 226 patients undergoing TPCNL were enrolled. After excluding 130 patients who failed to meet the inclusion criteria, a total of 96 eligible patients were randomized into 3 groups: group I, control group (n = 32); group II, intercostal nerve block with 15 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine and epinephrine (n = 32); and group III, NTI with 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine and epinephrine (n = 32). Pain status was assessed at postoperative 2, 8, and 24 hours and at discharge by visual analog scale score at rest (RVAS) and on deep breathing and coughing. Patient demographics and perioperative data between groups were comparable except for length of stay. Mean RVAS scores at postoperative 2 and 8 hours for group III were significantly less than those for group I (RVAS at 2 hours: 2.6 vs 4.9, P = .001; RVAS at 8 hours: 1.7 vs 3.3, P = .007). Mean RVAS scores at postoperative 24 hours had borderline significance (P = .050) among the 3 groups. Differences in mean deep breathing and coughing scores among groups were statistically significant (P = .002) only in the first 2 hours. All postoperative complications (5.4%, 5 per 92) were of grade 1 and not significantly different among groups. NTI is safe and effective in alleviating early postoperative pain for patients who underwent TPCNL.

A comparison of the efficacy of intercostal nerve block and peritubal infiltration of ropivacaine for post-operative analgesia following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective randomised double-blind study.

Background and Aims:Intercostal nerve blockade (ICNB) and peritubal infiltration of the nephrostomy tract are well-established regional anaesthetic techniques for alleviating pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This prospective study compared the efficacy of ICNB and peritubal local anaesthetic infiltration of the nephrostomy tract in providing post-operative analgesia following PCNL.Methods:Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status 1 and II patients scheduled for PCNL requiring nephrostomy tube were randomised to receive either peritubal infiltration or ICNB. At the completion of the procedure, patients in Group P received peritubal infiltration and those in Group I received ICNB at 10, 11, 12th spaces using fluoroscopy guidance. Postoperatively, patients were followed for 24 h for pain using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Dynamic VAS. Rescue analgesia was inj. tramadol 1 mg/kg IV when pain score exceeded 4. Time to first rescue analgesia, number of doses and patient's satisfaction were noted in all patients.Results:Pain scores were lower in the group I at all points of measurement than group P. The mean time to first demand for rescue analgesia was higher in Group I (13.22 ± 4.076 h vs 7.167 ± 3.92 h P - 0.001). The number of demands and the amount of analgesics consumed were less in Group I.Conclusion:ICNB provided superior analgesia as evidenced by longer time to first demand of analgesic, reduced number of demands and consumption of rescue analgesic. Peritubal infiltration, although less efficacious, may be a safe and simple alternative technique.

Efficacy of intercostal nerve block for neuropathic pain management in a patient unable to take oral medication

Efficacy of intercostal nerve block for neuropathic pain management in a patient unable to take oral medication

A randomized controlled trial of continuous extra-pleural analgesia post-thoracotomy: efficacy and choice of local anaesthetic

Controversy persists over the efficacy of intercostal nerve block administered through a tunnelled extrapleural catheter. We have undertaken a randomized, prospective double-blind trial of two different local anaesthetic regimes to evaluate the effect of this technique on post-thoracotomy pain relief and pulmonary function. Sixty-eight patients were randomized to receive bupivacaine 0.25% (n = 22), lignocaine 1% (n = 21) or 0.9% NaCl (saline) (n = 20) via an extrapleural catheter, inserted peroperatively. All patients underwent a standard posterolateral thoracotomy. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue pain score and by the requirement for opiate analgesia. Pulmonary function was measured using bedside spirometry. Pain scores were lower in the local anaesthetic groups at 24, 32 and 72 h compared with placebo (P< 0.05) and the total amount of opiate required was less than placebo for both lignocaine and bupivicaine (P< 0.05). Pulmonary function was better in the local anaesthetic groups throughout the post-operative period and was most pronounced at 24 h with a mean improvement of 30% for forced expiratory volume (FEV1), 24% for forced vital capacity (FVC) and 19% for peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) compared with placebo. There was no significant difference between pain scores, opiate requirement or pulmonary function between lignocaine and bupivicaine. CT scanning demonstrated containment of the local anaesthetic in an extra-pleural tunnel. Extra-pleural infusion of local anaesthetics is a simple technique, with low risk of complications and provides effective pain relief as well as an improvement in post-operative pulmonary function. Lignocaine is equally as effective as bupivacaine and its use would result in some cost-saving.